The ‘Cry-Terrorist’ Strategy Of Hamas Supporters

On Sunday, a tragic incident occurred at a pro-Israel rally in Thousand Oaks, California, where an elderly Jewish man lost his life after being struck with a megaphone by a pro-Hamas protester. This event raises significant concerns about anti-Semitism and the consequences of extreme rhetoric, yet it hasn't sparked the widespread national conversation one might expect.

The reaction to this event contrasts sharply with the media and public response to other incidents of violence or hate. It seems that the identities of the aggressor and the victim play a crucial role in determining the level of attention and outrage an incident receives. In this case, the perpetrator was a supporter of Hamas, and the victim was Jewish, which, according to some perspectives, fits into a broader narrative where certain groups are often portrayed as perpetual victims or oppressors regardless of the specific circumstances.

This narrative is also reflected in the way some public figures are treated in the media. For instance, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, known for her strong criticisms of Israel and support for Palestinian rights, is often portrayed as a victim, despite her influential position. This is attributed to her being a minority and her opposition to Western policies.

The media's handling of conflicts involving Israel and Hamas also comes into question. There seems to be a pattern where actions by Hamas, such as using human shields or placing military assets in civilian areas, are downplayed or excused, while Israel's defensive actions are scrutinized and often condemned. This discrepancy in reporting extends to the coverage of violence and hate speech in the U.S., where incidents against certain groups are highlighted more than others.

The death of the Jewish man in California and the subsequent media coverage exemplify this bias. Major news outlets reported the incident in a way that seemed to protect the broader narrative of victim and oppressor. This approach to reporting contributes to a skewed public perception, where the actions of certain groups are justified or excused based on their perceived status as oppressed or victimized, regardless of the actual circumstances.